THE BISHNUPRIYA MANIPURI FOOD
CULTURE
Introduction :
At the outset I express my
gratitude to the organizers of this seminar for giving me a chance to read out
this paper. I am neither a researcher nor a scholar in this field. However, I
have prepared this paper out my own experience being the member of the
community as referred above. My humble intention is to share my experience with
the scholars present and learn something out of their suggestions.
History says man is primarily
concerned with taking food for his nourishment, stimulations, strength and
preservation of his body. He is interested in eating proteins, fats etc for the
purpose. But at the same time he is also fond of taking tasty and delicious
food.
Food habit has become the part of
the culture of a community. Sometimes it also reflects the social philosophy,
the culture and way of life of the community. It is a fact that different
communities in the world have different food habits sometimes quite distinct to
each other sometimes similar. It is also a fact that the geographical and
climatic conditions are the prime factors for growing food habits amongst
different communities. The ingredients of food are primarily agricultural
products. The nature and quality of soil and quantity of rainfall and hot and
cold climates are the deciding factors of production of food ingredients in
different regions or locality. Therefore, the South Indian and North Indian
dishes are separate and distinct. Religion and social customs also play
important role in forming food culture in a community. In his verse,
Gokolananda Geetiswamy, national poet of the Bishnupriya Manipuris says :
“Agekate
beyapate mahumangso khasila
Kukir
sade jura baddiya kane angthi lamkorla.”
(The forefathers (of the
Bishunupriya Manipuris) were habituated in eating meat and non-vegitable items.
They tied their hair in the form of a jura and wore ear rings like the Kukis).
But after their conversion into
Ramandi and New vaishnabism of Sri
Chaitanya School
they forsook their habit of taking hot foods i.e. meat, onion, garlic etc which
are very rich in protein and are responsible for stimulation of anger and
biological urges. However, the community could not leave their habit of taking
fish, the habit of which grew up for centuries.
The political influence and
cultural exchanges also play an important part in forming separate food habit
in a community. The colonial rule in India had changed food culture of
the Indians. Different ethnic and tribal groups of the North East India are
changing their food habits because of their coming in contact with the plain
people like Bengalis and Hindustanis and vice versa.
These BM people have given the wrong information to the society as well as to the common people. Because there is nothing relation with the Mahabharata to present MANIPUR. This present MANIPUR was named in 1774 by Ching thong khomba (king Bhagyachandra) when he opted the Hinduism( Vaishnavism). And the first Raslila was held in 1777 by Ching thong under the influence of Bengal missionary (Bishnupuris). We Bishnupuriyas are immigrants in Manipur in between 16th to 18th century from Bishnupur kingdom (West Bengal) This Bishnupur kingdom was renounced as the origin of Vaishnavism. We Bishnupuriyas are Vaishnav by birth and Manipuri or meitei people opted Hinduism in 18th century according to the history of Manipur. Nobody can deny the history because if you deny history means you just deny your father,mother what ever so. The Mahabharatas MANIPUR is in odissa and mahendra giri mountain is also there. So why these BM people are trying to provide the wrong history?? Answer is to convert the Bishnupuri people to Manipuri with the help of Madoi or Kalisa people. Kalisa and Bishnupuriya communities are totally different in culture, language and behaviour. Kalisas are also known as Kalisa Manipuris because the married Manipuri, Naga, kuki etc wives and converted themselves into Manipuri after they entered into Manipur from West( ref- Mayang Supplement of LSI) GA Greiherson has briefly mentioned about these Kalisa People. For better knowledge please read the Mayang Supplement.
ReplyDeleteThese BM people have given the wrong information to the society as well as to the common people. Because there is nothing relation with the Mahabharata to present MANIPUR. This present MANIPUR was named in 1774 by Ching thong khomba (king Bhagyachandra) when he opted the Hinduism( Vaishnavism). And the first Raslila was held in 1777 by Ching thong under the influence of Bengal missionary (Bishnupuris). We Bishnupuriyas are immigrants in Manipur in between 16th to 18th century from Bishnupur kingdom (West Bengal) This Bishnupur kingdom was renounced as the origin of Vaishnavism. We Bishnupuriyas are Vaishnav by birth and Manipuri or meitei people opted Hinduism in 18th century according to the history of Manipur. Nobody can deny the history because if you deny history means you just deny your father,mother what ever so. The Mahabharatas MANIPUR is in odissa and mahendra giri mountain is also there. So why these BM people are trying to provide the wrong history?? Answer is to convert the Bishnupuri people to Manipuri with the help of Madoi or Kalisa people. Kalisa and Bishnupuriya communities are totally different in culture, language and behaviour. Kalisas are also known as Kalisa Manipuris because the married Manipuri, Naga, kuki etc wives and converted themselves into Manipuri after they entered into Manipur from West( ref- Mayang Supplement of LSI) GA Greiherson has briefly mentioned about these Kalisa People. For better knowledge please read the Mayang Supplement.
ReplyDelete